idearage.com

Home
Ext-fs Error Device Dm-0
Contact
Privacy
Sitemap

Home > Fs Error > Ext-fs Error Device Dm-0

Ext-fs Error Device Dm-0

It's already solved but I'd like to know if error become repetitive, is there any patch or a bugfix to correct it? when in fact they could be separate bugs, or one of the bugs could be a hardware problem, etc. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 0) minutes. Comment 2 John Hughes 2014-12-15 11:57:41 UTC Well, looking at fs/ext4/extents.c I see: static int ext4_alloc_file_blocks(struct file *file, ext4_lblk_t offset, ext4_lblk_t len, loff_t new_size, int flags, int mode) So it looks useful reference

TB0ne View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by TB0ne 10-08-2014, 04:00 AM #3 sandeep002gupta Member Registered: Apr 2011 Posts: 87 Your filesystem may have been damaged by the earlier forced fsck operations. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Unix & Linux Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration Blogs Recent Entries Best Entries Best Blogs Blog List Search http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/191370/ext4-lookup-deleted-inode-referenced-error-in-var-log-messages

Ext3 Fs Error Device Dm 0 In Start_transaction Journal Has Aborted

Many thanks to Kees Cook for finding and bisecting the buggy commit which introduced this bug (commit fd034a84e1, present since v3.2). LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_lookup: deleted inode referenced: User Name Remember Me? Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system? we've run fsck command from single user mode with ummount /data partition and then run command.

flashes a screen saying some permission issues in /var/www...
If this error occurs with an additional partition besides the root partition, simply unmount the broken filesystem and proceed with these operations.
TB0ne View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by TB0ne Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Search this Thread Advanced
Good luck, Jim Dishaw pcinvent24th February 2007, 08:38 AMThanks for your help, Jim Dishaw.
It's still present in Linus' tree as of a9e1e53bcfb29b3b503a5e75ce498d9a64f32c1e (10-Apr).

Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the I ran fsck manualy and after reboot the log shows: Dec 3 11:04:26 cedric kernel: [ 1.440438] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounting ext3 file system using the ext4 subsystem Dec 3 11:04:26 cedric PDA View Full Version : EXT3-fs error. Ext3 Fs Error Device Sdb1 If you can reliably reproduce it, and it doesn't reliably reproduce on an older kernel, then it becomes interesting.

Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Ext4 Fs Error Device Opts: errors=remount-ro,barrier=0 [ 35.526502] loop: module loaded [ 36.367517] RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module. [ 36.367520] RPC: Registered udp transport module. [ 36.367521] RPC: Registered tcp transport module. [ If you don't like to press y a thousand times, use a -y flag instead of -p as well - although in this case you will say automatically "yes" to every, Fix?

And I am getting following message [[email protected] ~]# dmesg | tailAdd. Ext4-fs Error Deleted Inode Referenced yes > Free blocks count wrong (11735574, counted=11735652). > Fix? Fix? Abort Offline collection upon new command.

Ext4 Fs Error Device

Is intelligence the "natural" product of evolution? I'll try to schedule the installation of a more up-to-date kernel on at least one of the machines, but it may take me a few days. Ext3 Fs Error Device Dm 0 In Start_transaction Journal Has Aborted Jeff, I tried the "mount /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /mnt/VolGroup00/LogVol00" according to the thred you shared with me. Ext4 Fs Error Device Mmcblk0p2 Kario indicated, you might look at checking the disk health using smartctl.

The mortgage company is trying to force us to make repairs after an insurance claim Are independent variables really independent? see here After that system looks healthy so far with no more RAID or SMART messages. Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. Opts: (null) EXT4-fs error (device dm-3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:738: group 186, 32764 blocks in bitmap, 32766 in gd Aborting journal on device dm-3-8. Ext4 Fs Error Device Sda1

Comment 1 Birger Harzenetter 2012-02-10 01:09:11 UTC Currently using 3.1.7 without issues. Fix? And by the time we get the ext4-error, basically what we have is the dead body lying in the alley. this page Can two integer polynomials touch in an irrational point?

Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started Ext4-fs Error (device Dm-0): Ext4_lookup: Deleted Inode Referenced: Inode 917533 was part of the orphaned inode list. If your fs is yet writable, mount it to readonly (mount /the/fs/mount/path -o remount,ro).

Fix?

Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 0) minutes. pcinvent23rd February 2007, 09:53 AMI have a FC5 server runing Apache and MySQL for more than a year without problem. You can convert that into a human readable time stamp as follows: % date -d @1404174299 Mon Jun 30 20:24:59 EDT 2014 The "error count" message will get cleared by e2fsck, Ext4 Fs Error Device Loop0 Inode 4137485 was part of the orphaned inode list.

These file systems will have a native ext3 layout of inode tables and block allocation bitmaps (as opposed to ext4's flex_bg layout). Current Customers and Partners Log in for full access Log In New to Red Hat? Comment 16 John Hughes 2015-08-11 15:15:01 UTC Ok, I've now seen the bug while running 3.18.19 (compiled by me straight from kernel git). Get More Info The read-only status is meant to help protect you from further data loss.Water over the proverbial dam now, but "fsck -f -y ..." is very dangerous to the health of your

However immediately thereafter (git linux-stable) I got random contents. Log Out Select Your Language English español Deutsch italiano 한국어 français 日本語 português 中文 (中国) русский Customer Portal Products & Services Tools Security Community Infrastructure and Management Cloud Computing Storage JBoss Having said all that, although you don't seem to be messing around with VMWare VMs, IMHO you best bet would be to backup all the data you can access, rebuild the

Contents